|
TABLE 1: How well words can be understood by parents |
|
By 18 months a
child's speech is normally 25% intelligible
By 24 months a child's speech is normally 50 -75% intelligible
By 36 months a child's speech is normally 75-100% intelligible
Lynch, Brookshire & Fox (1980), p. 102, cited in
Bowen (1998). |
Intelligibility to
strangers 12-48 months
A handy formula suggested by Dr Peter Flipsen Jr
(here;
see also Flipsen, 2006)
and others is used by some SLPs as a guide to the expected conversational intelligibility
levels
of preschoolers talking to unfamiliar listeners, or "strangers". The formula fits well with the suggestions of Coplan
& Gleason (1988) and is:
AGE IN YEARS / 4 x 100 = % UNDERSTOOD BY STRANGERS:
Child aged 1;0 = 1/4 or 25% intelligible to strangers
Child aged 2;0 = 2/4 or 50% intelligible to strangers
Child aged 3;0 = 3/4 or 75% intelligible to strangers
Child aged 4;0 = 4/4 or 100% intelligible to strangers
Pascoe (2005) is in general agreement,
and says, "By three years of age, a child's spontaneous
speech should be at least 50% intelligible to unfamiliar adults"...
"By four years of age, a child's spontaneous speech should be
intelligible to unfamiliar adults, even though some articulation and
phonological differences are likely to be present."
Intelligibility in general 24-48 months
Alternative, usually
unreferenced, guidelines are available on the Internet. For example
these
Speech Intelligibility Guidelines
come from
HelpForKidSpeech.org.
By 2;0 a child's speech should be 70%
intelligible (to ?)
By 3;0 a child's speech should be 80% intelligible
By 4;0 a child's speech should be 90% intelligible
Like the Weiss (1982) scale, this
particular scale does not indicate whether the percentages relate to
conversational or single word intelligibility, nor whether they refer to
familiar or unfamiliar listeners.
Less than 66% percent
In Dr Michelle Pascoe's
helpful
Speech Intelligibility article on the Apraxia-Kids web site she cites Gordon-Brannan & Hodson (2000)
who determined that children above the age of 4;0 with
speech intelligibility score of less than 66%
should be considered as candidates for Speech-Language Pathology intervention.
What this means is that if less than 2/3 of the utterances of a child
aged 4;0 in conversation with an unfamiliar listener can be understood
by that listener, then intervention is indicated. Unfamiliar listeners
should be able to understand at least 66% of what a child of 4;0 says.
Intelligibility Rating Scale
In the
Quick Screener child speech assessment procedure described
here a simple, subjective 5-point conversational speech intelligibility rating
scale is used. It is useful to have an intelligibility rating from a
child's parent or parents, SLP and a
"stranger" (unfamiliar listener). The scale is:
1: completely
intelligible in conversation
2: mostly intelligible in conversation
3: somewhat intelligible in conversation
4: mostly unintelligible in conversation
5: completely unintelligible in conversation
References
Bowen, C. (1998). Developmental
phonological disorders: A practical guide for families and teachers.
Melbourne: The Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
details here
Coplan, J., & Gleason, J.R. (1988). Unclear speech: recognition and
significance of unintelligible speech in preschool children. Pediatrics,
82, 447-452.
Flipsen, P., Jr. (2006). Measuring the
intelligibility of conversational speech in children. Clinical
Linguistics and Phonetics. 20, 4, 202-312.
ABSTRACT
Gordon-Brannan, M., &
Hodson, B. (2000). Intelligibility/Severity Measurements of
Prekindergarten Children's Speech. American Journal of Speech-Language
Pathology, 9, 141-150.
ABSTRACT
Lynch, J.I., Brookshire, B.L., & Fox, D.R.
(1980). A
Parent - Child Cleft Palate Curriculum: Developing Speech and Language. CC
Publications, Oregon.
Pascoe, M. (2005 May).
What is intelligibility? How do SLP's
evaluate and address children's intelligibility intervention?
The Apraxia-Kids Monthly, 6, 5. http://www.apraxia-kids.org/site/c.chKMI0PIIsE/b.980831/apps/s/content.asp?ct=911039
Accessed August, 2005.
Schiavetti, N. (1992). Scaling
procedures for the measurement of speech intelligibility. In Kent, R. D.
(Ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders.(pp. 11-34). Philadelphia,
PA: John Benjamins.
Weiss, CE (1982). Weiss
Intelligibility Test. Tigard, OR: CC. Publications.
Table 2: Phonological Processes
Table 3: Elimination of Phonological Processes
Table 4: Phonetic Development
Q&A: Speech Sound Disorders
Developmental Phonological Disorders
Typical Speech Acquisition
Typical
Language Development |